I just finished reading an anthology of the 2007 Nebula Awards for review. I have to say, I'm a little disturbed by the two stories they put first in the book. Had I picked this book up off the shelf and glanced at them, I would not have purchased the book. I do know I'll probably never read anything by these two authors.
I will be the first to admit I'm a traditionalist when it comes to science fiction stories. I like them to have a beginning, a middle, and an end and make some sort of sense. I also like them to make an attempt to adhere to basic rules of writing - like one point of view per paragraph.
I can hear my daughter-in-law and critique partners now. This is an area where I have trouble. But I don't promote my books as the best in the world. The Nebula award does. Thus when the writer consistently switches point of view all through the story, I look at it as a first draft, not a final publishable piece. I had trouble following the story, didn't know who was "speaking" or what was going on and had an unsatisfying ending that didn't really end, just sort of petered off. Were I to grade this story, I'd probably have given it a C- or D+ and that only because there is imaginative potential here. But the technique of writing, in my opinion, was terribly executed.
And therein lies the problem. I've see this in a lot of "modern" short stories. The gift of storytelling is there, but where is the technique? Writing is an art, but like any art, there are two distinct aspects to it. There is the inspirational part - the idea, the concept that is unique to every artist. This is something that can't be learned. It is a part of who the person is. Then there is the technique. This is something that can be learned. In music, it is fingering and scales and breathing or beat. In painting, it is about color and brush strokes and mediums, in writing, it is about grammar and spelling and punctuation.
Okay, there is a lot more to art and music and writing than these - an awful lot more - but the point is, you can have a brilliant artist/writer/musician, but if she can't get her idea across to the public, then something is wrong.
In this story I read, I saw no point to it at all. There was a beginning, a sort of rambling middle, then nothing. No real end. No real plot. No tying up of loose ends - of which there were a lot. For me, the technique was missing.
Maybe I'm being too harsh, but I don't have time these days to waste on stories that go nowhere. Had I been reading this for fun instead of review, I'd have tossed it after the first couple of pages. Which is a shame because I would have missed the really good stories later on and the insightful essays on the state of science fiction. Why this story is an award winner, I'll never know. Maybe I'm not keeping up with the state of writing the way it is today. If that is the case, and this is an example of the best of science fiction writing today, I'll stick to my old favorites and let the younger generation read these "new" styles of writing.
In the meantime, I'm loving the new Harry Potter book.
*************
progress last night - five pages of new work bringing my total for the month to 50 pages, my goal met. 74 pages edited for a friend. And several chapters of H.P. read.
*******************************
Birthdays: Raymond Chandler, Hubert Selby, Jr., John Nichols, Nancy Mairs, Lisa Alther, Lynn Lauber
Tips and Teasers: If you were a character in a Harry Potter book, who would you be and why?
Thought for the day: "Compete only with yourself." – Mary Ellen Donahue